The decision of the election and the Kano: Audu Bulama’s comment on the decision, similar to the error in the video 2023
Barrister Audu Bulama Bukarti commented and discussed the decision of the court on the governorship election of Kano state in the north of Nigeria. Esq is part of the APC legal team. In this discussion, we have commented a lot on the things that have been done on the decision of the election, the three lawyers have all condemned the words of the judge, saying that the red hats are terrorists and bandits, none of them showed their approval of this word. Kano election decision: Audu’s commentary is critical of the decision, just like the error in the video Kano election decision: Audu’s commentary is critical of the decision, just like the error in the video Here is Audu Bulama Bukarti’s comment on his understanding of what happened and what could happen in the next court if we do the right thing and follow the law.
Declaring the election to be “inconclusive” is as much as I can understand and knowing what I have done. This is correct on Abba Kabir Yusuf who gave a gap of one hundred and twenty thousand and a few changes that there are two hundred thousand and one thing that has not been voted on. no, if the election is completed and the gap is not equal to or not more than the majority of the place where no election was held, then this election has to be held again. And this is not an opinion that I took after the verdict, because the other day in the election town barrister Abba Hikima called me and told me to discuss what has happened since then. I told him to understand what I know about this election. “inconclusive”. And after a week when you planned the robbery, I said where in the court it is unlikely that the election was declared “inconclusive”. In the second part of the declaration of Gawuna as governor, I think there is a mistake here.. “Because of the first reason: if the court accepts two hundred thousand seats and something that was killed or not done, there should be a re-election, and Abba has a gap of one hundred and twenty votes and his gap is not enough The number of votes is 200,000 and some changes, so if he got a margin of 36,000 votes and some changes, after the court’s calculation, the gap is also 200,000 votes. no election. It should be understood that the court said that he was in the lead with thirty-six thousand votes and something less than the number of votes that were killed since one hundred and sixty-three votes of Abba Kabir were removed. thing, then you have to go back and re-vote and include this, whoever gets the most votes goes. In the second understanding: the one hundred and sixty five thousand votes that the court said were not included in the claim of the APC since they did not put it in box after box “ward by ward” not one chicken in one chicken place are spoiled, they did not put ” “Bleadings” were not claimed, then the court did not look at the evidence, so we claimed correctly since this one hundred and sixty-five thousand votes were not claimed, it is not fair that the judge sat down. in her office with her “calculator” she removed them and said they were illegal, since they were not claimed in detail and not in their APC document, that’s what she understood – said Bulama.